society

on creating reality by our thoughts going backward in time

~ florries ~ Leave a comment

Eternity exists without time, outside of time, disregarding time.

In this BBC documentary they say that some physicists today seriously believe that our interpretations of reality affects the functions in the universe when it was created, thus we are constantly contributing to the process of creation. Others say that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, literally just a quantum leap away all the time – if time now exists, which is doesn’t in quantum calculations.

These are my notes from watching it a while ago:

Our interpretations of reality reach “backwards” in time and the world is re-created. We create our reality with our power of observation and interpretation.

Assume that the Source – assuming that it is real – sends impulses for us to continue to interpret and bring our interpretations in line with love/bliss, so that love and bliss – the basis of the force of life and creation – can reach through in our creation, in our universe. The more we interpret a reality which is love and full of bliss, the more this power, the power of life, is let through. And when we create societies based upon other forces, they will crumble and die with time cause they deny the power of All that Exists. The true nature will always brake through in our interpretations – it is in our nature to interpret with love and compassion as our guidelines. When we are in line with this flow we are the most powerful because we connect with that which is really real, that which is existence it is All: love, compassion – life force which is just creating, more and more elegantly, all the time…

If the currently fashionable M-theory is right there are eternities of other dimensions inside an on appearance empty glass – and eternities of energy in every molecule, just a particle leap away…

Through every molecule one can reach these other dimensions and realities. This is what the shamans call travelling through the wheel of time, which actually kind of feels / looks like going through a tunnel.

Weird “New World Order” Debate article published today in the most influential swedish newspapers: DN and SVD

~ florries ~ 2 Comments

Today there was a debate article on written by Bo Ekman from the Tällberg Foundation, promoting some kind of New World Order in Dagens Nyheter and Svenska Dagbladet, the two most influential newspapers in Sweden.

The headline of the article was: En ny världsordning ett måste efter debaclet i Köpenhamn = A new world order is a must after the debacle in Copenhagen. Here a quote from the article which summarizes its message:

Men om nu 192 nationer ändå skulle ha kommit överrens om det ”perfekta avtalet”, så saknas i upplägget den tillsynsmyndighet som med ekonomisk, polisiär och militär makt skulle ha kunnat korrigera de nationer som av olika skäl inte skulle möta åtaganden och mål.

But if 192 nations would have agreed on the “perfect deal” (in Copenhagen), the idea/plan were missing the control instance, which with economic and military power as well as a police force could correct the nations which of different reasons would not meet their commitments and goals.


One of my comments on this debate-article:

First of all, this article has very little to do with the climate crisis, and very much to do with global power.

I am a citizen of the world, and would love to live in a more democratic society on a global and a local scale, in cooperation, understanding, exchange, justice – peace and love! But I want to avoid a world government with a world army which has too much power and is ruled by some obscure elite – which is almost reality already.

Unfortunately there are well founded worries that Mr Ekman (Tällberg Foundation) and his friends are supporting an small part of society – the “elite” – some of them even without thinking about it. And of those who know what they are doing, many believe they are doing it for a good cause. Others are thinking that they are just behaving pragmatically.

Many things that Ekman wrote in his article are true: he talked about the urgency in solving the environmental crisis and UN:s apperent incapacity in doing so. The problem is that he is presenting irrational solutions on real problems. There are guaranteed many better and more constructive ways to solve humanities problems than the one which he suggests.

found: where science and buddhism meet by Gerald Penilla

~ florries ~ 2 Comments

Just found this great, simple, to the point summary of the connection between Quantum Science and the basic ideas of classic Asian philosophy and religion like Buddhism, Taoism and Hinduism, made by Gerald Penilla

One can of course make many arguments against drawing the sort of conclusions which Gerald present in this film. The most common one argument that I have heard is that mathematics are only abstractions and that they just cannot say anything about reality as it really is. Which brings at least my mind to the question if one can say anything about reality as it is…

No matter what point of view you have, I think that you will find the connections which Gerald presents here at least interesting.

Where Science and Buddhism meet part 1 and 2

I think that the most striking about the conclusions presented above is that we are very likely co- creating not only ourselves, but also each other and our reality with our thoughts and attitudes, in a not only spiritual but also physical sense.

A very good reason to love ourselves, one another and our surroundings:  to love all of existence.

And with loving I do not mean some illusion-based infatuation which is denying the difficult, challenging or “bad” sides of reality, each other, existence;

no, I mean a deep, true feeling of compassion, which results in compassion, and love, streaming out of the body, mind and soul, influencing oneself and the surroundings to do good and feel well. And love.