science and knowledge

on creating reality by our thoughts going backward in time

~ florries ~ Leave a comment

Eternity exists without time, outside of time, disregarding time.

In this BBC documentary they say that some physicists today seriously believe that our interpretations of reality affects the functions in the universe when it was created, thus we are constantly contributing to the process of creation. Others say that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, literally just a quantum leap away all the time – if time now exists, which is doesn’t in quantum calculations.

These are my notes from watching it a while ago:

Our interpretations of reality reach “backwards” in time and the world is re-created. We create our reality with our power of observation and interpretation.

Assume that the Source – assuming that it is real – sends impulses for us to continue to interpret and bring our interpretations in line with love/bliss, so that love and bliss – the basis of the force of life and creation – can reach through in our creation, in our universe. The more we interpret a reality which is love and full of bliss, the more this power, the power of life, is let through. And when we create societies based upon other forces, they will crumble and die with time cause they deny the power of All that Exists. The true nature will always brake through in our interpretations – it is in our nature to interpret with love and compassion as our guidelines. When we are in line with this flow we are the most powerful because we connect with that which is really real, that which is existence it is All: love, compassion – life force which is just creating, more and more elegantly, all the time…

If the currently fashionable M-theory is right there are eternities of other dimensions inside an on appearance empty glass – and eternities of energy in every molecule, just a particle leap away…

Through every molecule one can reach these other dimensions and realities. This is what the shamans call travelling through the wheel of time, which actually kind of feels / looks like going through a tunnel.

what came first: maths or matter / observer or particle

~ florries ~ 2 Comments

Just read some interesting news in an article written by one of my favorite science journalist, Karin Boys, in the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter:

they have found the physical existence of the magically beautiful E8-pattern – displayed in the image here below – one of the most complex mathematical concepts in the world which took weeks for a hall of super-computers to calculate and resulted in 400 000 printed pages. Researchers have been hoping that E8 is connected to the search for the great Theory of Unification, which shall bring together Einstein’s general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics (which is not possible with todays maths). And now symmetries from this pattern was discovered by a group of German and English physicists when they froze cobalt nitrate to the absolute 0-point, which made the electrons arrange themselves in kind of rows or chains. Then they exposed this to magnetic fields, and in the magnetic fluctuations which evolved the strikingly beautiful E8 pattern was spotted.

by Claudio Rocchini (wikipedia)

I mean, if it came down to looks I’d so far wote for this pattern to be the door to open the true Unification theory, it is just really amazing, isn’t it?!

This is not the first time mathematicians has calculated something which physicists did not yet know of, or they even considered impossible. The last time such a discovery was made was in 1974 by Sir Roger Penrose, who I actually made an 1 hour long interview with in the Vienna Riesenrad back in 2004. He calculated something called quasicrystals, a pattern of two shapes which can repeat endlessly without repeating a pattern. This was considered completely impossible, but was later found, for example in a type of stone in Siberia, and has even shown to have quite some practical use to it.

Continue reading →

Ig Nobel Prize 2009 winners

~ florries ~ Leave a comment

There are great winners of the lg Nobel Prize this year, here link: Ig Nobel Prize Winners 2009

They are all fantastic this year, but I especially like the veterinary medicine prize which went to Catherine Douglas and Peter Rowlinson of Newcastle University, UK, for showing that cows who have names give more milk than cows that are nameless…

For those who are unfamiliar with the Ig Nobel Prizes, here a description from the founders, Improbable Research:

Ig Nobel Prizes honor achievements that first make people laugh, and then make them think. The prizes are intended to celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people’s interest in science, medicine, and technology.

http://improbable.com/