When newspapers like Swedish www.DN.se describe people who question the official story of 9/11 as paranoid conspiracy theorists who does not understand what happened on 9/11, and therefore make up stories, one hesitates to go out and say – well, I’m one of those people. What can I say, like so many others I’m just not completely convinced by the official story. But most of all I just do not understand why there should not be a more thorough, official investigation into an event that in so many ways has shaped the last ten years of our history (see quote from Marketwatch here below for some of the points of criticism on the earlier commission).

DN continues with implying that the groups which bring up questions on 9/11 even threatens the general trust in the democratic process, and thus democracy itself. Well, I can agree on that trust is endangered by all twist and turns around this event, but that is not solved by mocking the people who question the official story. I also think that DN and other media outlets which makes similar statements threaten the trust in the democratic process, as well as in the media, with their arrogant attitude in this matter.

I don’t pretend to know what happened on 9/11, but there are a lot of unanswered questions – enough to motivate a second commission on the matter. Continue reading →